Firstly
conceived in 1967-68, "Maledetto" is a composition for seven virtuoso
speakers that sounds as modern as anything in the last five years, a commanding
statement by a largely ignored composer. What Kenneth Gaburo declares in the
notes is essential to comprehend the aesthetic significance of this work: "One
can view each human as a unique and complex linguistic system, capable of generating
more than one kind of language at a time () Thus each human can be viewed
as a contrapuntal, rather than a mono-lingual system". This explains just
about everything. The building block at the core of this piece is the word "screw"
in its various connotations, both in terms of meaning and sonic structure; from
that, a whole edifice of intersecting expressions is raised, up to a point in
which the attentive listener gets gradually pushed away from any theatrical
interpretation of the score (which, oddly enough, is indeed part of a six-hour
theatre performance) to enter a thoroughly musical realm, the voices perceived
as assorted typologies of unusual instruments. Over the course of these 45 minutes,
whose complexity can't possibly be illustrated by a sheer review, we're literally
immersed in technological imagery and, above all, bodily reactions, either described
or simply perceptible (sibilance, syllables, breath, chuckling, call-and-response).
As Warren Burt rightly states, this is "a deep and profound celebration
of the body, the physical, the sexual". The power of this material just
overwhelms the other music contained here, even though the latter deals with
the important issue of people reacting to the notion that "nuclear war
has made their lives expendable". A percussionist interacts with tapes
of individual views (or non-views) about the main topic along the lines of a
dramatic performance that should be seen live for better understanding. Having
the gravity of the implication been established, there's not a single minute
of the (still interesting) "Antiphony VIII" that equals the emotional
and technical intensity of "Maledetto" which alone is worth of the
purchase of this disc, as it's definitely indispensable listening. -Massimo
Ricci
A dangerous man: To Gaburo, language, life and music should not be separated.
In terms of his potential marketability, Kenneth Gaburo could easily have matched
John Cage. Both, after all, had a talent of finding demonstrative phrases and
striking musical forms for their ideas, which allowed even the average Joe to
grasp what they were on to in the somewhat unlikely even of him being
interested in finding out, that is. Their respective oeuvres were marked by
a peculiar penchant for allowing the public to either dismiss them as fluff
or lift them to a metaphysical plateau where journalistic criticism and mainstream
rejections could no longer reach them. Depending on ones point of view,
too, it was even possible to make out revolutionary tendencies beneath the surface:
Just as with Cage, Gaburos musical ideas implied radical changes in the
way that art should or could be perceived and in the way it was being
sold to the public.
To Gaburo, language and music should not be separated. Nor should performance
and reception of art. From his point of view, a piece did not begin on stage,
but during the very first rehearsal something he would take to extremes
on Maledetto. Percussionist Steve Schick, meanwhile, who performs
Antiphony VIII on this disc, a piece which requires the soloist
to pass through emotional states of ignorance and anger to exhaustion, can still
acount how the composer moved his instruments farther apart only moments before
the concert was to begin.
The reason was simple yet stunning: Schick had become too proficient in playing
the music. His gradual breakdown had turned into acting instead of real physical
fatigue. For Gaburo, it didnt matter whether or not the public could tell
one from the other, because the music, as it was conceived by the score, only
came into being by ignoring any external observer, existing for its own
sake and within its own space. If lart pour lart were a doctrine,
even James Joyce would seem like a liberal in comparison.
Quite obviously, Gaburos principles and beliefs were much closer connected
to theatre than to music. In a dramaturgical play and in the hands of capable
actors, the process of pretending turns into something real, after all, and
words still have the power to shape worlds. So it was, too, with Gaburo, whose
Maledetto spans a 45-minute long cosmos of monologues, dialogues
and multilogues, screams, sylables and streams of thoughts, debates, dreams
and dada.
On the outside, the work is a lingual discussion of the term screw
in all of its connotations as well as a onomatopoetic dissection of its sounds.
Musically, it constitutes a fantastically immersive experience and a hypnotic
ritual for eight voices and a short opening section of rustling hiss. Everything
bases on language rather than meaning and logic here, yet language can not exist
on its own accord. Only in the moment of utterance, when the words leave the
lips of a performer, does it become real. In this instance, too, the liberation
from the need to make sense introduces a feeling of limitless wideness and endless
possibilities: You could gladly get lost in this piece for hours.
Leading up to its premiere, Gaburo had practised with the particapating performers
for months and by the time the version on this album was recorded, the cast
had already grown in experience and confidence. And yet, everything sounds fresh,
naive even, as if the vocalists feel their way forward towards making contact
and establishing relationships as if they were meeting for the first time.
Gaburo's art rejected passive consumption, demanded participation and therefore
opposed the traditional and proven business model of mass marketing music to
uncritical hordes of buyers. Its logical consequence was that if language was
music and life was a form of art, then everyone could be an artist. In a world,
which mostly regards music as a tightly delineated, restrictively defined comfort
zone, Kenneth Gaburo was a dangerous man. No wonder John Cage, whose ideas could
be still be dismissed as humurous and whimsical, eventually eclipsed him in
medial terms and in musical history.- By Tobias Fischer, Tokafi
|